Fourth Annual Chicago Supportive Oncology Conference

Community Oncology

Volume 4, Number 10 (October 2007)

Letter from the Editor

578

 

Zeroing in on focused beams

David H. Henry, MD, FACP, Editor

Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA

This month, we dedicate our issue of Community Oncology to radiation therapy and some of the rapidly developing applications, techniques, and subspecializations in the field. Dr. Jondavid Pollock, of Schiffler Cancer Center in Wheeling, West Virginia, has done an admirable job piloting this special edition of the journal as our Guest Editor.

full text 42 kb

Community Dialogue

586

 

A radiation pioneer reflects

Community Oncology interviews Herman Suit, MD, PhD, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

He sold ladies’ shoes to put himself through college and entered medical school when he was 19. Coming of age in the wake of the Manhattan Project, Dr. Suit studied atomic and nuclear physics and decided he wanted to be a radiation oncologist—against the advice of his professors who thought cancer was a soon-to-be-cured disease. He has championed proton beam therapy for close to 40 years. Dr. Suit spoke with this month’s Guest Editor, Jondavid Pollock, MD, PhD, about how the field of radiation therapy has grown and where he expects it to go.

full text 74 kb

Original Contributions

589

 

Spinal radiosurgery for metastatic disease

Scott G. Soltys, MD, and Iris C. Gibbs, MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Management of metastatic spinal disease, which affects more than 100,000 patients yearly, is a continuing challenge. Treating symptomatic lesions often includes radiotherapy to control pain and neurologic symptoms. Advances in the delivery of radiation have allowed the implementation of radiosurgical principles to extracranial sites such as the spine. The authors examine the rationale behind the increasingly common use of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery, some of the initial data supporting it, and its potential advantages over conventional fractionated radiotherapy.

abstract full text 111 kb

599

 

Proton beam radiotherapy: a specialized treatment alternative

Allan F. Thornton, MD, Markus Fitzek, MD, PhD, Susan Klein, PhD, Edward Dickey, BA, MaryBeth Sullivan, BA, Avril O’Ryan-Blair, MS, Niek Schreuder, MS, Christopher Allgower, PhD, Anthony Mascia, MS, Jonathan Farr, PhD, and John Cameron, PhD

Indiana University School of Medicine, Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Institute, and Indiana University Cyclotron Facility/Indiana University, Bloomington, IN

Although not a new modality, proton beam therapy has long been regarded as a relatively exotic form of radiation therapy, consigned to one of two centers: Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and Loma Linda University Medical Center near Los Angeles. The cost of the accelerator and beam-line systems, along with the personnel needed to maintain the equipment, has made this highly effective and proven therapy available in only a limited number of centers.

abstract full text 360 kb

616

 

Stereotactic body radiation therapy: 2007 update

Paul W. Read, MD, PhD

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA

Stereotactic body radiation therapy has been made possible by the convergence of new body immobilization systems, improvements in radiation therapy planning algorithms, and the commercial availability of image-guided radiation units capable of delivering and verifying the spatial accuracy of such treatment. Several institutional phase I/II clinical trials designed to determine the maximal permissible doses and at least one cooperative group trial have been completed for tumors in the lungs, liver, and spine. Initial reports of efficacy in early-stage peripheral non-small cell lung cancer patients are encouraging.

abstract full text 126 kb

Challenging Cases/Rare Cancers

610

 

Merkel cell carcinoma: an uncommon and challenging disease entity

Jondavid Pollock, MD, PhD

Radiation Oncology, Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling, WV

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare cutaneous malignancy with an aggressive course and a propensity to involve regional lymph nodes. Adjuvant radiotherapy following surgery is effective in reducing the rate of locoregional recurrence but appears to have little impact on the rate of distant metastases—and therefore survival. The response of patients to systemic adjuvant chemotherapy is unpredictable, and no standard chemotherapeutic regimen is available.

abstract full text 86 kb

Managing Side Effects

625

 

Recognizing and treating a new entity on the quality-of-life front: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

Christopher D. Jahraus, MD, Sandra Brandt, RN, and Doug Bettenhausen, PharmD

Gadsden Regional Cancer Center, Gadsden, AL; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama–Birmingham, AL; and Department of Medical Affairs, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Morrisville, NC

Emerging data suggest that small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) contributes to numerous gastrointestinal disorders. Recognizing this, our institution evaluates patients undergoing abdominopelvic radiotherapy (RT) for SIBO if they develop diarrhea or related symptoms. A retrospective case review was conducted. To our knowledge, this is the first published report demonstrating an association between SIBO and RT.

abstract full text 110 kb

Adverse Events Alert

633

 

Pharmacovigilance and reporting of bisphosphonate use and osteonecrosis of the jaw

Matthew J. Fisher, June M. McKoy, MD, MPH, JD, Beatrice J. Edwards, MD, and Charles L. Bennett, MD, PhD, MPP

Divisions of Geriatric Medicine and Hematology Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; and VA Midwest Center for the Management of Complex Chronic Care, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Concerned groups need better coordination when it comes to reporting serious adverse drug reactions.

full text 89 kb

Washington Update

637

 

Medicare cuts and ESA restrictions

Ted Okon

Community Oncology Alliance, Memphis, TN

In issuing a national coverage decision limiting the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in the treatment of cancer, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services appears to have overstepped its authority in ignoring FDA-approved labeling, spawned confusion among physicians and payers, and raised concerns over whether it really protects patients.

full text 47 kb

© 2007 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors or advertisers. The authors, editors, and publishers make every effort to ensure that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinion, or statement is published in this journal and that drug names, dosages, and recommendations are accurate. However, readers should confirm all dosage schedules against the manufacturer’s package information data. The Publisher, Editorial Board, and their employees accept no liability whatsoever for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading data, opinion, or statement.