Community Oncology

Volume 3, Number 12 (December 2006)

Letter from the Editor

737

 

Translating treatment to community practice

Linda D. Bosserman, MD, FACP, Editor

Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Inc., La Verne, CA

Even with the holidays and the year winding down, practitioners stay busy and always welcome practical information that can help them in clinic. This month’s Community Translations features a review of key literature on cetuximab (Erbitux) for locally advanced head and neck cancers. Also in this issue are two new columns (Cases in Community Oncology and Adverse Events Alert) and a disturbing investigation commissioned by the journal, which illustrates the huge disparities in the price of oral cancer drugs purchased by seniors through the Medicare Part D program.

full text 43 kb   expanded discussion 10 kb

Community Translations

745

 

Targeted therapy combined with radiotherapy for squamous cell head and neck cancer

The publication of a study by Bonner et al has been met with much enthusiasm by community oncologists: cetuximab prolongs the duration of locoregional disease control and survival when added to radiotherapy without causing mucositis. The standard of care had been to give concurrent chemotherapy, usually a combination of cisplatin and 5-FU with irradiation of the head and neck. But this is a challenging regimen for patients. Concomitant cetuximab with radiation therapy seems to offer a dramatic improvement in disease and progression-free survival compared with radiation therapy alone, with a more manageable toxicity profile.

 

FROM THE COMMUNITY ONCOLOGIST'S PERSPECTIVE
Recent developments in head and neck cancer treatment: the role of cetuximab

Kevin B. Knopf, MD, MPH

Pacific Hematology and Oncology Associates, San Francisco, CA

 

FROM THE NURSE'S PERSPECTIVE
Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients being treated with cetuximab therapy

Caryn Scheinberg Andrews, CRNP, PhD

Alvin & Lois Lapidus Cancer Institute at Northwest Hospital Center, Randallstown, MD

full text 115 kb

Controversies in Patient Care

753

 

Medicare’s drug plan: huge price disparities for common cancer drugs

Brian Klepper, PhD, and David Pauker

Center for Practical Health Reform, Atlantic Beach, FL, and Coalition to Advance Prescription Drug Education (CARxE), San Francisco, CA

The editors of Community Oncology chose seven oral cancer drugs and asked the authors to analyze differences in pricing among the drugs within three communities, each market a different size. The drugs are anastrozole (Arimidex), exemestane (Aromasin), imatinib (Gleevec), sunitinib (Sutent), erlotinib (Tarceva), temozolomide (Temodar), and thalidomide (Thalomid). The markets are Chicago, Illinois; Portland, Oregon; and Virginia Beach, Virginia. The results of this small study offer a stark illustration of the difficult nature of Medicare’s Part D program.

abstract full text 68 kb

Original Contribution

759

 

The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer

Danny Y. Song, MD

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Historically, patients with locally advanced prostate cancer have had poor rates of disease control regardless of which treatment modality they received. Although the optimal management approach for these patients remains to be determined, the addition of androgen suppression to radiotherapy has been shown to improve both biochemical control and overall survival rates. Data from randomized and retrospective studies support the importance of local control and radiation dose in treating patients with locally advanced disease. Recent data suggest that radiation dose remains important when radiotherapy is used concurrently with androgen suppression.

abstract full text 196 kb

Challenging Cases/Rare Cancers

776

 

Treatment of a Jehovah's Witness using a transfusion-free autologous stem cell transplant protocol

Nicole M. Brown, BA, Barbara Matthews, RN, OCN, and Patricia A. Ford, MD

Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT) is the standard treatment for multiple myeloma and relapsed or high-risk lymphomas. To avoid bleeding complications and to treat profound anemia posttransplant, as a rule, patients are given transfusions after APBSCT. But Jehovah's Witnesses decline transfusions based on religious convictions, making the treatment of these patients a special challenge. The authors describe a transfusion-free APBSCT protocol with acceptable morbidity and mortality used on 48 Jehovah's Witnesses.

 

FROM THE PATIENT'S PERSPECTIVE
Bloodless stem cell transplant: a patient’s perspective

Ericka Peterson-Hobson, as told to Randi Londer Gould

abstract full text 127 kb

Washington Update

767

 

Balancing patient assistance programs and physician reimbursement

Joel B. Finkelstein

Two companies recently announced financial assistance programs designed to limit the amounts patients have to pay for expensive new therapies. It’s unclear how these pricing arrangements will affect relatively new Medicare rules on reimbursement.

full text 47 kb

Cases in Community Oncology

769

 

Newly diagnosed metastatic gastric cancer

Michael A. Danso, MD

US Oncology, Cancer Centers of Florida, Orlando, FL

This new column is based on the format of an Elsevier textbook entitled Hematology and Oncology Pearls, by Dr. Danso and Ethan Basch.

full text 73 kb

Adverse Events Alert

772

 

Counterfeit epoetin alfa products

Cara C. Tigue, BA, and Charles L. Bennett, MD, PhD, MPP

Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

This new regular feature is designed to help protect your patients with important updates.

full text 81 kb

Legal Matters

774

 

Dissolving partnerships: when a physician retires

Lee W. Doty, JD

The partners in one practice want to look ahead and anticipate the issues they’ll need to deal with.

full text 65 kb

2006 Index

782

 

Author and subject indices

full text 77 kb

© 2006 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors or advertisers. The authors, editors, and publishers make every effort to ensure that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinion, or statement is published in this journal and that drug names, dosages, and recommendations are accurate. However, readers should confirm all dosage schedules against the manufacturer’s package information data. The Publisher, Editorial Board, and their employees accept no liability whatsoever for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading data, opinion, or statement.